Studies & Reports

Carbon Management Mary Wiencke Carbon Management Mary Wiencke

Greenhouse Gas and Clean Energy Accounting Methodology Catalog

This study presents a catalog of Greenhouse Gas (GHG) and clean energy accounting methodologies in use across the Western U.S., inclusive of practices used under Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS); energy supply mix disclosure programs; mandatory GHG reporting and reduction programs; and voluntary utility and end-use consumer reporting. This catalog aims to provide a representative, but not necessarily comprehensive, description of the GHG accounting practices in use today by utilities across the West, and is derived from a combination of detailed interviews with 15 participating utilities; program information provided by participating utilities; public documentation of required accounting practices under the various programs; and our own research.

Link to PDF

Read More
Carbon Management Ryan Bottem Carbon Management Ryan Bottem

Achieving Western States GHG Reduction Objectives

Many states are embarking on aggressive state policies aimed at reducing GHG emissions, with particular attention aimed at largely or fully reducing GHG emissions from the electricity sector over medium-term horizons (e.g., by 2040).  The regulatory compliance design will have impacts on electricity markets and the effectiveness of the policies.  To analyze different regulatory approaches and their impacts on electricity market participation, the Public Generating Pool, in collaboration with PacifiCorp, sponsored a study by The Analysis Group.  

The study considers and compares the impacts associated with resource-based accounting, which focuses on the procurement made by the utility, versus flow-based accounting, which focuses on tracking the electricity flows and delivered energy to customers.  The comparison of the two approaches led to several conclusions regarding compliance systems for state-level decarbonization policies:

  1. Physical realities of the electricity system make flow-based, source-to-load tracking of attributes or emissions infeasible, impractical, or inefficacious.

  2. Resource-based accounting is compatible with market-based transactions, thus supporting the evolving market structures that will be important for the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of decarbonization policies.

  3. Resource-based accounting offers more compliance flexibility, particularly with regard to the electricity delivery timing.

  4. Resource-based systems are less administratively burdensome and can draw on experience from approaches used for compliance by states with RPS policies in the Northeastern and mid-Atlantic US.

  5. Flow-based systems are not currently used anywhere in the US. Variants of a resource-based system are used in other jurisdictions in the US.

  6. Consideration will need to be given to how to integrate compliance with RPS/CES policies and emissions-based policies.

Technical Report PDF

Slide-deck PDF

Executive Summary PDF

Read More
Resource Adequacy Ryan Bottem Resource Adequacy Ryan Bottem

Resource Adequacy in the Pacific Northwest

The ability to maintain Resource Adequacy under certain scenarios was identified as a concern during the 2017–2018 E3 studies. Scenarios that limit the building of new natural gas or decarbonization beyond 80% below 1990 levels were identified as needing a different model to evaluate the adequacy of the system. As a result, the Public Generating Pool, in collaboration with Puget Sound Energy, Avista, and Northwestern, sponsored a study that examines the adequacy of the power system in 2018, 2030, and 2050 under different decarbonization levels.

Technical Report PDF

E3 Presentation PDF

Summary & FAQ PDF

PGP One-Page Summary PDF

Read More
Resource Adequacy Ryan Bottem Resource Adequacy Ryan Bottem

Pacific Northwest Low Carbon Scenarios

The Public Generating Pool, in collaboration with Energy Northwest, sponsored a study that investigates an approach to simultaneously achieve environmental and economic goals in the electric sector. If the Western states are to evolve policies further to achieve carbon emissions goals, PGP believes it is important for efforts to be informed by an understanding of which alternatives are least-cost and most effective in achieving substantial reductions from 1990 levels. PGP believes that this study employs a useful planning methodology for informing public policy decisions aimed at reducing carbon emissions. A least-cost planning methodology is technology-neutral, can be expanded to other sectors, and can be adapted to changing conditions over time.

Read More